top of page

Forum Comments

General Discussion
In Forum
Jan 13, 2021
Interesting concept, but seems misguided. Instead of privileging actual disabled experiences and histories, Southbank Art Centre have chosen to distort and manipulate them. Not only that, but distort them in a way that misleadingly portrays the history of disabled rights advocacy as extremist, violent and actively engaged in terrorism. Edgar has written for the Guardian about his desire to document the 'proud, vibrant history, community and culture' which deaf people, and disabled people generally, have. Surely this exhibition could have documented and celebrated that? Instead he has created a trail of lies (misleading Facebook adverts, a fake Wikipedia page, an entire exhibition) to promote a project that ultimately says nothing about the history of disabled people or their political self-organisation, and actually makes a lot of people go home thinking it was a largely shameful affair. The real radical disabled rights groups in the 1980s and 90s engaged in peaceful direct action and civil disobedience, and helped create the demand which brought in the 1995 Discrimination Act and reasonable adjustment in British law. Those pioneers, not imagined terrorists fighting dreamed up eugenicist policies, are the real antecedents of the struggle that disabled people continue to make against austerity cuts to public services, lack of provision for those in need, discriminatory practices in the workplace and accessibility in public space. We don't need to lie about disabled history to make people think about how it might matter.


More actions
bottom of page